Responses of pediatricians to questions on extremely low birth weight infants: a cross-sectional study

封面


如何引用文章

全文:

开放存取 开放存取
受限制的访问 ##reader.subscriptionAccessGranted##
受限制的访问 订阅或者付费存取

详细

BACKGROUND: In 2011, new standards of medical birth criteria were adopted in Russia, corresponding to the World Health Organization recommendations of 1975. Newborns with extremely low birth weight are at high risk of developing disabling conditions and experiencing reduced overall quality of life.

AIM: The work aimed to analyze pediatricians’ opinions on issues related to the birth of extremely low birth weight infants.

METHODS: A cross-sectional survey was conducted in 2023–2024 in medical organizations of Saratov using an author-designed questionnaire. A total of 106 pediatricians with over 5 years of professional experience participated.

RESULTS: The study addressed decision-making regarding the need for resuscitation of extremely low birth weight infants and the permissibility of withdrawing life-support systems in cases of severe disabling conditions.

The majority of pediatricians (64.7%) disagreed with the current birth criteria. A total of 32.7% of respondents opposed resuscitative efforts for such newborns. Most participants (62.3%) reported never facing unfounded accusations of negligent homicide of newborns, which they attributed to the specifics of their work. Nearly half (46.7%) of respondents believed that the survival of extremely low birth weight infants results in a sharp deterioration of pediatric population health indicators.

CONCLUSION: Most pediatricians disagree with the current birth criteria. Their opinions are shaped by the uniquely high level of professional responsibility, the complexity of decision-making, unpredictable outcomes, and experiences of unjust accusations in the death of extremely low birth weight infants. The respondents emphasized the necessity for both parents to participate in decision-making regarding resuscitation, palliative care, and withdrawal of life-support systems in the event of disabling conditions in extremely low birth weight infants.

全文:

受限制的访问

作者简介

Anna Samsonova

Saratov State Medical University named after V. I. Razumovsky

Email: bespeshnui_angel@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-0326-1380
SPIN 代码: 1042-1930
俄罗斯联邦, Saratov

Irina Krom

Saratov State Medical University named after V. I. Razumovsky

编辑信件的主要联系方式.
Email: irina.crom@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-1355-5163
SPIN 代码: 4854-1094

MD, Dr. Sci. (Medicine), Professor

俄罗斯联邦, Saratov

Maria Orlova

Saratov State University

Email: orlova-maria2010@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-2340-8343
SPIN 代码: 1399-9666

Cand. Sci. (Psychology), Assistant Professor

俄罗斯联邦, Saratov

Ludmila Ertel

Kuban State University

Email: ela1958@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-9260-4914
SPIN 代码: 4295-3168

MD, Dr. Sci. (Medicine), Professor

俄罗斯联邦, Krasnodar

Tatyana Lipchanskaya

Saratov State Medical University named after V. I. Razumovsky

Email: tatyanalp@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-7755-1834
SPIN 代码: 5698-6429

MD, Cand. Sci. (Medicine), Assistant Professor

俄罗斯联邦, Saratov

Elena Kovalenko

Saratov State Medical University named after V. I. Razumovsky

Email: kovlena@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-3426-1236
SPIN 代码: 9277-1454
俄罗斯联邦, Saratov

参考

  1. Popov VL, Sokolova OV. About the interpretation of the cause of death of a newborn in unusual conditions. Forensic medical expertise. 2022;65(2):46–50. doi: 10.17116/sudmed20226503146 EDN: AGUCBQ
  2. Efimov DK, Ryazankina KB. The effectiveness of using modern principles of medical support for children born with extremely low body weight (ELBW) (case report of a child e., born with a body weight of 485 grams). Russian pediatric journal. 2024;5(1):15. EDN: DIAQIN
  3. Bolbocean C, van der Pal S, van Buuren S, et al. Health-related quality-of-life outcomes of very preterm or very low birth weight adults: evidence from an individual participant data meta-analysis. Pharmacoeconomics. 2023;41(1):93–105. doi: 10.1007/s40273-022-01201-2 EDN: DFHPHC
  4. Prisyazhnaya NV. Sociology of social orphanhood: modern discourses of studying the problem. In: Society and Health: Current State and Trends of Development. Moscow: FGAOU VO Pervyi MGMU im. I.M. Sechenova Minzdrava Rossii; 2013. P. 185–194. (In Russ.) EDN: RNPFTP
  5. Prisyazhnaya NV. Social anamnesis and the place of health in the system of life values of pupils of orphanages. In: Sociology of medicine: science and practice: collection of articles. Reshetnikova AV, editor. Moscow: Izdatel'stvo Pervogo MGMU im. I.M. Sechenova; 2012. P. 303–308. (In Russ.) Available from: https://rusneb.ru/catalog/001980_000024_DVGPB%7C%7C%7CBIBL%7C%7C%7C0000015496/
  6. Reshetnikov AV, Prisyazhnaya NV. Studying the nature of social orphanhood in correlation with status characteristics and personal health. Sociology of medicine. 2020;19(1):25–31. doi: 10.17816/1728-2810-2020-19-1-25-31 EDN: NMGYTW
  7. Kaempf JW, Moore GP. Extremely premature birth bioethical decision-making supported by dialogics and pragmatism. BMC Med Ethics. 2023;24(1):9. doi: 10.1186/s12910-023-00887-z EDN: AMLRZC
  8. Arzuaga BH, Cummings CL. Deliveries at extreme prematurity: outcomes, approaches, institutional variation, and uncertainty. Curr Opin Pediatr. 2019;31(2):182–187. doi: 10.1097/MOP.0000000000000731
  9. Lantos JD. Ethics of care for the micropreemies. Just because we can, should we? Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2022;27(2):101343. doi: 10.1016/j.siny.2022.101343 EDN: QPVCQF
  10. Lee CD, Nelin L, Foglia EE. Neonatal resuscitation in 22-week pregnancies. N Engl J Med. 2022;386(4):391–393. doi: 10.1056/NEJMclde2114954 EDN: IUMCMH
  11. Backes CH, Rivera BK, Pavlek L, et al. Proactive neonatal treatment at 22 weeks of gestation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021;224(2):158–174. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2020.07.051 EDN: JDVLZG
  12. Lantos JD. Ethical implications of the shifting borderline of viability. Semin Perinatol. 2022;46(2):151531. doi: 10.1016/j.semperi.2021.151531 EDN: ICEBMC
  13. Marmion PJ. Refusing to examine extremely premature newborns. Linacre Q. 2018;85(1):9–10. doi: 10.1177/0024363918756390
  14. Lavin JP Jr, Kantak A, Ohlinger J, et al. Attitudes of obstetric and pediatric health care providers toward resuscitation of infants who are born at the margins of viability. Pediatrics. 2006;118 Suppl 2:S169–176. doi: 10.1542/peds.2006-0913O
  15. Baranov AA, Albitsky VYu, Volgina SYa. Deep premature babies as a bioethical problem. Russian Paediatric Journal. 1999;(1):29–32. (In Russ.) EDN: YLDFRZ
  16. Delaru NV. Neonatologists attitude to management of newborns with extremely low body weight: negative attitude prevails. Journal of Volgograd State Medical University. 2008;(2(26)):22–23. EDN: KVGXAT
  17. Delaru NV. Respiration of extremely low birth weight preterm infants: neonatologists' attitudes are becoming more positive. Russian bulletin of perinatology and pediatrics. 2018;63(4):143. (In Russ.) EDN: XXRBGX

补充文件

附件文件
动作
1. JATS XML

版权所有 © Eco-Vector, 2025



СМИ зарегистрировано Федеральной службой по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий и массовых коммуникаций (Роскомнадзор).
Регистрационный номер и дата принятия решения о регистрации СМИ: серия ПИ № ФС 77 - 86498 от 11.12.2023 г. 
СМИ зарегистрировано Федеральной службой по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий и массовых коммуникаций (Роскомнадзор).
Регистрационный номер и дата принятия решения о регистрации СМИ: серия
ЭЛ № ФС 77 - 80649 от 15.03.2021 г.