Comparative analysis of the opinions of obstetricians and gynecologists on the risks of a complicated pregnancy in women

Cover Page


Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Since 1992, a decline in the birth rate has been registered in Russia. Negative natural population growth has been accompanied by a deterioration in women’s reproductive health and a high incidence of complicated pregnancies and childbirths. Providing follow-up care for women of reproductive age is considered a priority for preventing complicated pregnancies and childbirths.

AIM: The study aimed to analyze and compare the opinions of obstetricians and gynecologists on the risks of complicated pregnancies and the importance of follow-up care for pregnant women.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: The sociological study “The Role of Follow-Up in the Healthcare of Pregnant Women” involved 157 obstetricians and gynecologists from women’s clinics in the Saratov region. The majority (97%) of respondents were women. Almost half of the respondents (44%) had more than 30 years of work experience. A structured questionnaire developed by O.P. Shchepin et al. was used for data collection.

RESULTS: A recent analysis of the opinions of obstetricians and gynecologists in the Saratov region revealed that the majority (60%) of respondents strongly believed in the importance of enhancing follow-up care in protecting women’s health during preconception preparation, pregnancy, and postpartum management. Meanwhile, 46% of respondents highlighted the importance of follow-up care specifically during pregnancy. According to the respondents, 78% of pregnant women are registered for follow-up early (within the first 12 weeks of pregnancy). Additionally, 88% of respondents attributed late registration to a lack of personal responsibility for health — both for the woman and the unborn child. To facilitate timely registration, 62% of respondents engage in individualized work with women of reproductive age. The possibility of consulting a pregnant woman about the detected diseases in the conditions of public healthсare was mentioned by 70% of the respondents. While 70% of respondents reported observing normal labor courses in their practice, 30% indicated that complicated deliveries occur more frequently. In the context of social care for pregnant women, 62% of respondents issue certificates of transfer to lighter work duties. Responses varied widely regarding the possible causes of endangering the health of a woman and her child. According to 62% of respondents, improving the follow-up care for pregnant women will definitely have an impact on reducing maternal mortality. A comparative analysis revealed that the obstetricians and gynecologists participating in these surveys identified social risks as the primary threats to maternal and child health.

CONCLUSION: The study confirms the social determinacy of complicated pregnancies, which indicates the need to overcome the medicalization of follow-up care for pregnant women.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

Anastasiya A. Rebrova

Saratov State Medical University named after V.I. Razumovsky

Email: rebrova_a@list.ru
ORCID iD: 0009-0004-7250-9567
SPIN-code: 9844-4578
Russian Federation, Saratov

Irina L. Krom

Saratov State Medical University named after V.I. Razumovsky

Author for correspondence.
Email: irina.crom@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-1355-5163
SPIN-code: 4854-1094

MD, Dr. Sci. (Medicine), Professor

Russian Federation, Saratov

Marina V. Erugina

Saratov State Medical University named after V.I. Razumovsky

Email: lab48@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-8743-4500
SPIN-code: 7016-3160

MD, Dr. Sci. (Medicine), Professor

Russian Federation, Saratov

Nana E. Mkheidze

City Hospital

Email: Poti.sjdcc@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0009-0002-7978-0283
Georgia, Poti

Maria М. Orlova

Saratov State University

Email: orlova-maria2010@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-2340-8343
SPIN-code: 1399-9666

Cand. Sci. (Psychology), Assistant Professor

Russian Federation, Saratov

References

  1. Beglov DE, Artymuk NV, Novikova ON, et al. Risk factors for extremely preterm and very preterm birth. Fundamental and Clinical Medicine. 2022;7(4):8–17. doi: 10.23946/2500-0764-2022-7-4-8-17 EDN: WTFPHP
  2. Sokolovskaya TA, Stupak VS. Morbidity of pregnant women in the Russian Federation: trends and prognosis. Russian Bulletin of Obstetrician-Gynecologist. 2022;22(5):7–14. doi: 10.17116/rosakush2022220517 EDN: KJPMWH
  3. Moiseeva KE, Mikhailova YP, Alekseeva AV, et al. Formation, current status and main problems of the organization of outpatient obstetric and gynecological care in Russia. Medicine and Health Care Organization. 2022;7(2):89–99. doi: 10.56871/1658.2022.95.20.011 EDN: OBFMYQ
  4. Reshetnikov AV, Sobolev KE. Conceptual model of organization of medical and sociological monitoring of the results of strategic planning for the development of regional health care (by the materials of the Moscow region). Sociology of Medicine. 2022;(1):5–15. doi: 10.17816/socm109235 EDN: GWQGPZ
  5. Reshetnikov AV, Prisyazhnaya NV. Studying the nature of social orphanhood in correlation with status characteristics and personal health. Sociology of Medicine. 2020;(1):25–31. doi: 10.17816/1728-2810-2020-19-1-25-31 EDN: NMGYTW
  6. Sharapova OV, Mingazova EN, Nesterov AS, et al. The analytical review of normative and organizational support of functioning of perinatal service in the Russian Federation in 2000-2020. Problems of social hygiene, public health and history of medicine. 2021;29(4):885–891. doi: 10.32687/0869-866X-2021-29-4-885-891 EDN: UGUUNJ
  7. Shchepin OP, Rastegayeva IN. The objectives of dispensarization in health care of pregnant women. Problems of social hygiene, public health and history of medicine. 2012;(2):3–6. (In Russ.) EDN: RBQLIL
  8. Blumenshine P, Egerter S, Barclay CJ, et al. Socioeconomic disparities in adverse birth outcomes: a systematic review. Am J Prev Med. 2010;39(3):263–272. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2010.05.012
  9. Gushulenko AY, Burina EA. Psychological readiness for motherhood as a factor of health-saving behavior of pregnant women. Scientific research of graduates of the Faculty of Psychology SPbSU. 2020;8:5–12. (In Russ.) EDN: APXQAI
  10. Kurbanismailov RB, Narkevich AN, Vinogradov KA, et al. Prevalence of socio-biological risk factors in pregnant women of Krasnoyarsk region and their impact on adverse pregnancy outcomes. Health Manager. 2019;(3):48–53. (In Russ.) EDN: ZCRZBB
  11. Pevalin DJ, Wade TJ, Brannigan A, et al. Beyond biology: the social context of prenatal behaviour and birth outcomes. Soz Praventivmed. 2001;46(4):233–239. doi: 10.1007/BF01593178
  12. Sharma R, Synkewecz C, Raggio T, et al. Intermediate variables as determinants of adverse pregnancy outcome in high-risk inner-city populations. J Natl Med Assoc. 1994;86(11):857–860.
  13. Cherkasov SN, Bezmel'nicyna LY, Meshkov DO, et al. Evaluation of the influence of the risk factors on the current and outputs of pregnancy. Bulletin of the N.A. Semashko National Research Institute of Public Health. 2019;(3–4):105–112. doi: 10.25742/NRIPH.2019.03.012 EDN: PMBLSO
  14. Jedrychowski WA, Perera FP, Tang D, et al. The relationship between prenatal exposure to airborne polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and PAH-DNA adducts in cord blood. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol. 2013;23(4):371–377. doi: 10.1038/jes.2012.117
  15. Erickson AC, Arbour L. The shared pathoetiological effects of particulate air pollution and the social environment on fetal-placental development. J Environ Public Health. 2014;2014:901017. doi: 10.1155/2014/901017
  16. Meng G, Thompson ME, Hall GB. Pathways of neighbourhood-level socio-economic determinants of adverse birth outcomes. Int J Health Geogr. 2013;12:32. doi: 10.1186/1476-072X-12-32
  17. Farley TA, Mason K, Rice J, et al. The relationship between the neighbourhood environment and adverse birth outcomes. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2006;(20):188–200. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3016.2006.00719.x
  18. Lane SD, Keefe RH, Rubinstein R, et al. Structural violence, urban retail food markets, and low birth weight. Health Place. 2008;14(3):415–423. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2007.08.008
  19. Wilcox MA, Smith SJ, Johnson IR, et al. The effect of social deprivation on birthweight, excluding physiological and pathological effects. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1995;102(11):918–924. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1995.tb10882.x

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c) 2025 Eco-Vector



СМИ зарегистрировано Федеральной службой по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий и массовых коммуникаций (Роскомнадзор).
Регистрационный номер и дата принятия решения о регистрации СМИ: серия ПИ № ФС 77 - 86498 от 11.12.2023 г. 
СМИ зарегистрировано Федеральной службой по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий и массовых коммуникаций (Роскомнадзор).
Регистрационный номер и дата принятия решения о регистрации СМИ: серия
ЭЛ № ФС 77 - 80649 от 15.03.2021 г.