Problematic aspects of medical artificial intelligence. Part 1



Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI), like medicine, is a dynamically developing field that can be considered both a science and an art. This makes it much more difficult to use artificial intelligence compared to other technologies that come with a user manual. Research and start-ups in the field of medical AI are rapidly multiplying: the popularity of smart mobile devices, networked applications and remote digital services is growing. However, there are still some problems that complicate the widespread use of AI algorithms in everyday clinical practice. The reasons for this are the high cost of operating neural network platforms and the limited qualifications of some medical professionals in the field of computer technology. These are only temporary difficulties, though, which should and will be gradually resolved. This article focuses on the most sensitive points that are currently hindering the accelerated progress of machine learning in healthcare.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

Виталий Анатольевич Бердутин

ФБУЗ ПОМЦ ФМБА России

Author for correspondence.
Email: vberdt@gmail.com

кандидат медицинских наук, доцент кафедры выездного обучения по интегрированным дисциплинам

Russian Federation

References

  1. Prisyazhnaya N.V., Reshetnikov A.V. Education in a pandemic: vectors of digital transformation. Sociological research. 2022; No. 4. 149-151. doi: 10.31857/S013216250018694-6 (in Russian).
  2. Reshetnikov A.V., Shamshurina N.G., Shamshurin V.I. Economics and management in healthcare: Textbook and workshop. 2nd ed., trans. and additional M.: Yurayt Publishing House. 2020; 328. ISBN 978-5-534-10359-5 (in Russian).
  3. Berdutin V.A., Abaeva O.P., Romanova T.E., Romanov S.V. Application of artificial intelligence in medicine: achievements and prospects. Literature review. part 1. Sociology of medicine. 2022. V. 21. No. 1. 83-96 (in Russian).
  4. Berdutin V.A., Abaeva O.P., Romanova T.E., Romanov S.V. Application of artificial intelligence in medicine: achievements and prospects. literature review. Part 2. Sociology of medicine. 2022. Vol. 21. No. 2. 77-83 (in Russian).
  5. https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/4-common-ways-that-ai-driven-medical-3346085/
  6. Quinn T.P., Senadeera M., Jacobs S., Coghlan S., Le V. Trust and medical AI: the challenges we face and the expertise needed to overcome them. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2021; 28(4): 890-894. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocaa268
  7. Reshetnikov A.V., Moiseenko N.V., Khachaturyants G.A. Transparency of medicines and medical devices accounting in medical organizations - current challenges and opportunities. Compulsory health insurance in the Russian Federation. 2020. No. 1; 52-57 (in Russian).
  8. The Malicious Use of Artificial Intelligence: Forecasting, Prevention, and Mitigation. 2018. 101. https://img1.wsimg.com/blobby/go/3d82daa4-97fe-4096-9c6b-376b92c619de/downloads/MaliciousUseofAI.pdf?ver=1553030594217
  9. Stoecklin M.P., Jang J., Kirat D. DeepLocker: How AI Can Power a Stealthy New Breed of Malware. Security Intelligence. 2018. https://securityintelligence.com/deeplocker-how-ai-can-power-a-stealthy-new-breed-of-malware/
  10. Berdutin V. Socionic vision on Bioethics and Deontology. Lap Lambert Academic Publishing. 2018; Pg. no: 396. https://www.lap-publishing.com/catalog/details/store/ru/book/978-613-4-97887-3/socionic-vision-on-bioethics-and-deontology
  11. Reshetnikov A., Fedorova J., Prisyazhnaya N., Kolesnichenko O., Sotnik A., Shamshurina N. Health management for sustainable development. Proceedings of the 2nd World Conference on Smart Trends in Systems, Security and Sustainability, WorldS4 2018. 2. 2019; 51-56.
  12. Powles J., Hodson H. Google DeepMind and healthcare in an age of algorithms. Health Technol 2017; 7 (4): 351-67.
  13. Howard A., Borenstein J. The ugly truth about ourselves and our robot creations: the problem of bias and social inequity. Sci Eng Ethics. 2018; 24 (5): 152-36.
  14. Ma X., Niu Y., Gu L., et al. Understanding adversarial attacks on deep learning based medical image analysis systems. Pattern Recogn. 2020; 107332
  15. Reddy S., Allan S., Coghlan S., Cooper P. A governance model for the application of AI in health care. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2020; 27 (3): 491-7.
  16. Babel B., Buehler K., Pivonka A., Richardson B., Waldron D. Derisking machine learning and artificial intelligence. Technical report, McKinsey&Company, 2019. https://www.mckinsey.com/business-functions/risk/our-insights/derisking-machine-learning-and-artificial-intelligence
  17. Bottou L. From machine learning to machine reasoning. Mach Learn. 2014; 94 (2): 133-149.
  18. Syneos Health Communications. Artificial intelligence for authentic engagement: patient perspectives on health care’s evolving AI conversation. 2018. https://syneoshealthcommunications.com/perspectives/artificial-intelligence-for-authentic-engagement
  19. Vayena E., Blasimme A., Cohen I.G. Machine learning in medicine: addressing ethical challenges. PLoS Med 2018; 15 (11): e1002689.
  20. Alvarez-Melis D., Jaakkola T.S. Towards robust interpretability with self-explaining neural networks. In Proceedings of 32nd Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS); 2018; Montréal, Canada.
  21. Grote T., Berens P. On the ethics of algorithmic decision-making in healthcare. J Med Ethics. 2020; 46 (3): 205-211.
  22. Payrovnaziri S.N., Chen Z., Rengifo-Moreno P., et al. Explainable artificial intelligence models using real-world electronic health record data: a systematic scoping review. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2020; 27 (7): 1173-1185.
  23. DeCamp M., Lindvall C. Latent bias and the implementation of artificial intelligence in medicine. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2020.
  24. Bjerring J.C., Busch J. Artificial intelligence and patient-centered decision-making. Philos Technol. 2020; 1-23.
  25. Ploug T., Holm S. The right to refuse diagnostics and treatment planning by artificial intelligence. Med Health Care Philos. 2020; 23 (1): 107-114.
  26. Nagendran M., Chen Y., Lovejoy C.A., et al. Artificial intelligence versus clinicians: systematic review of design, reporting standards, and claims of deep learning studies. BMJ. 2020; 368.
  27. Gunning D., Aha D. DARPA’s Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) program. AIMag. 2019; 40 (2): 44-58.
  28. Dalton-Brown S. The ethics of medical AI and the physician-patient relationship. Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 2020; 29 (1): 115-21.
  29. FDA. Proposed regulatory framework for modifications to artificial intelligence/machine learning (AI/ML)-based software as a medical device (SaMD): Discussion Paper, 2019. https://www.fda.gov/media/122535/download
  30. Shukla S. Enhancing Healthcare Insights, Exploring Diverse Use-Cases with K-means Clustering. International Journal of Management, IT & Engineering. 2023; 13 (8), 60-68.
  31. Keane P.A., Topol E.J. With an eye to AI and autonomous diagnosis. NPJ Digit Med. 2018;1:40. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-018-0048-y
  32. Winkler J.K., Fink C., Toberer F., Enk A., Deinlein T., Hofmann-Wellenhof R., et al. Association between surgical skin markings in dermoscopic images and diagnostic performance of a deep learning convolutional neural network for melanoma recognition. JAMA Dermatol. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamadermatol.2019.1735.
  33. Kelly С.J., Karthikesalingam A., Suleyman M., Corrado G., King D. Key challenges for delivering clinical impact with artificial intelligence. BMC Medicine. 2019; 17:195 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-019-1426-2
  34. Berdutin V.A., Berdutina E.V. Logistics of applied solutions for lean healthcare and socionic typology. LAP LAMBERT Academic Publishing: Beau Bassin, 2020; 205 p. (in Russian).
  35. Giuste F.O., Sequeira R., Keerthipati V.,et al. Explainable synthetic image generation to improve risk assessment of rare pediatric heart transplant rejection. Journal of Biomedical Informatics. 2023; 139(3); 104303. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2023.104303

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c) Eco-Vector



СМИ зарегистрировано Федеральной службой по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий и массовых коммуникаций (Роскомнадзор).
Регистрационный номер и дата принятия решения о регистрации СМИ: серия ПИ № ФС 77 - 86498 от 11.12.2023 г. 
СМИ зарегистрировано Федеральной службой по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий и массовых коммуникаций (Роскомнадзор).
Регистрационный номер и дата принятия решения о регистрации СМИ: серия
ЭЛ № ФС 77 - 80649 от 15.03.2021 г.



This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies