South Africa's and Nigeria's Activities at the UN: Quest for Leadership in Africa

Capa

Citar

Texto integral

Acesso aberto Acesso aberto
Acesso é fechado Acesso está concedido
Acesso é fechado Acesso é pago ou somente para assinantes

Resumo

The article offers a comparative analysis of South Africa's and Nigeria's foreign policy behaviour at the United Nations, viewed through the lens of their regional leadership ambitions. The author proposes a three-pronged approach to the analysis, combining quantitative assessment of voting practices in the General Assembly, content analysis of addresses to the UNGA and an exploration of country-specific priorities, strategies and partnerships within the Security Council. The study suggests that South Africa acts more assertively across UN structures, advancing both the pan-African agenda and its own diplomatic initiatives. Pretoria effectively balances regional interests with those of key external partners, thereby reinforcing its image as a continental leader. Nigeria, by contrast, tends to focus on issues linked to domestic challenges or its immediate subregional context. This inward orientation limits Abuja's potential to articulate broader African interests on the global stage. The divergence in approaches highlights South Africa's comparative advantage in using multilateral diplomacy to strengthen its leadership position within Africa and expand its international influence through the UN system.

Sobre autores

N. Panin

Institute for African Studies, Russian Academy of Sciences

Email: contact@panin-nikita.ru
ORCID ID: 0009-0000-1802-9694
Post-graduate student, Junior Researcher, Centre for Russian-African Relations and African Foreign Policies Moscow, Russia

Bibliografia

  1. Панин Н.А. Многосторонняя дипломатия. *Африка 2023. Возможности и риски. Экспертно-аналитический справочник*. Москва, 2023.
  2. Panke D. 2021. Compensating for limitations in domestic output performance? Member state delegation of policy competencies to regional international organizations. *International Relations*. Vol. 35. № 1. Рр. 90–125. doi: 10.1177/0047117820970320
  3. Oksenberg M., Economy E. (Eds.). 1999. China Joins the World: Progress and Prospects. N.Y.: Council on Foreign Relations Press.
  4. Ball M. 1951. Bloc Voting in the General Assembly. *International Organization*. Vol. 5. Рр. 3–31.
  5. Панин Н.А. Практика голосования государств Африки южнее Сахары на Генеральной Ассамблее ООН: последние тенденции и основные стратегии. *Рабочая тетрадь № 74*. М.: НП РСМД, 2023.
  6. Jönsson C., Hall M. 2003. Communication: An Essential Aspect of Diplomacy. *International Studies Perspectives*. Vol. 4. № 2. Рр. 195–210. doi: 10.1111/1528-3577.402009
  7. Chayes A., Handler Chayes A. 1995. Revitalizing International Organizations. *The New Sovereignty: Compliance with International Regulatory Agreements*. Рр. 271–286. Harvard University Press. doi: 10.2307/j.ctv1pnes3m.17

Arquivos suplementares

Arquivos suplementares
Ação
1. JATS XML

Declaração de direitos autorais © Russian Academy of Sciences, 2025