Comparative assessment of the nature of the combined action of insecticides: different methodical approaches
- Authors: Veshchemova T.E.1, Masaltsev G.V.1, Rakitskii V.N.1, Chkhvirkiya E.G.1, Kuzmin S.V.1, Tsatsakis A.M.2
-
Affiliations:
- Federal Scientific Center of Hygiene named after F.F. Erisman of the Federal Service for Supervision in Protection of the Rights of Consumer and Man Wellbeing
- University of Crete
- Issue: Vol 103, No 9 (2024)
- Pages: 1025-1030
- Section: PREVENTIVE TOXICOLOGY AND HYGIENIC STANDARTIZATION
- Published: 15.12.2024
- URL: https://rjsocmed.com/0016-9900/article/view/646070
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.47470/0016-9900-2024-103-9-1025-1030
- EDN: https://elibrary.ru/yvwyur
- ID: 646070
Cite item
Abstract
Introduction. Pesticide mixtures containing insecticide methomyl are commonly used in agriculture. However, the interaction of their active ingredients in a mixture has been insufficiently studied.
The purpose of the study was to evaluate the nature of the combined action of a mixture of insecticides methomyl (carbamate) and bifenthrin (pyrethroid) using various methods: a classical model (orthogonal planning of the experiment using nonlinear variables); a generalized linear regression model for the binomial distribution (probit regression); and an isobologram. The study was conducted at the Federal Scientific Center of Hygiene named after F.F. Erisman of the Federal Service for Supervision in Protection of the Rights of Consumer and Man Wellbeing, according to the protocol approved by the local bioethical commission.
Materials and methods. Ninety male outbred rats were administered 9 combined doses of the insecticides (combinations of LD16, LD33 and LD50 for the individual compounds, as devised from a preliminary study).
Results. Impaired coordination, tremor of the limbs and head, turning into convulsions, rapid (shallow) breathing were observed in all groups. The data on mortality as used to construct 2 mathematical models, as well as to construct an isobologram.
Limitations. The study was limited to studying the indicators of acute oral toxicity, without taking into account the possible repeated exposure.
Conclusion. The models showed that the additive effect for the combination of methomyl and bifenthrin was only observed for combinations when the individual dose of bifenthrin was equal to or greater than 45 mg/kg b.w. (LD33) and the dose of methomyl was less than 30 mg/kg b.w., as all animals receiving a dose of 30 mg/kg b.w. of methomyl (LD50) in the mixture died. Therefore, the dose of methomyl dictated the toxic effect of the mixture, which should be accounted for in hygienic regulation of methomyl-containing formulations.
Compliance with ethical standards. The study was approved by the Bioethical Commission of the of the Federal Scientific Center of Hygiene named after F.F. Erisman of the Federal Service for Supervision in Protection of the Rights of Consumer and Man Wellbeing, protocol № 01/22 dated 27.10.2022.
Contribution:
Veshchemova T.E. — research concept and design, material collection and data processing, statistical processing, text writing;
Masaltsev G.V. — research concept and design, material collection and data processing, statistical processing, text writing;
Rakitskii V.N. — concept and design of research, scientific guidance;
Chkhvirkiya E.G. — scientific guidance;
Kuzmin S.V. — scientific guidance;
Tsatsakis A.M. — scientific guidance.
All authors are responsible for the integrity of all parts of the manuscript and approval of the manuscript final version
Acknowledgment. The study was carried out within the framework of the industry scientific program of the Federal Service For Surveillance on Consumer Rights Protection and Human Wellbeing of the Russian Federation (Rospotrebnadzor) “Hygienic scientific justification for minimizing risks to the health of the population of Russia” (2016–2020), “Scientific justification of the national system for ensuring sanitary and epidemiological well-being, health risk management and improving the quality of life of the population of Russia” (2021–2025).
Conflict of interest. The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Acknowledgement. The study had no sponsorship.
Received: May 16, 2024 / Revised: June 12, 2024 / Accepted: June 19, 2024 / Published: October 16, 2024
Keywords
About the authors
Tatiana E. Veshchemova
Federal Scientific Center of Hygiene named after F.F. Erisman of the Federal Service for Supervision in Protection of the Rights of Consumer and Man Wellbeing
Email: veshchemova.te@fncg.ru
MD, PhD, senior researcher at the Occupational Hygiene Department of the Institute of Hygiene, Toxicology of Pesticides and Chemical Safety of the Federal Scientific Center of Hygiene named after F.F. Erisman of the Federal Service for Supervision in Protection of the Rights of Consumer and Man Wellbeing, Mytishchi, 141014, Russian Federation
e-mail: veshchemova.te@fncg.ru
Gleb V. Masaltsev
Federal Scientific Center of Hygiene named after F.F. Erisman of the Federal Service for Supervision in Protection of the Rights of Consumer and Man Wellbeing
Email: masalcev.gv@fncg.ru
PhD, head of the Department of Toxicology of the Institute of Hygiene, Toxicology of Pesticides and Chemical Safety of the Federal Scientific Center of Hygiene named after F.F. Erisman of the Federal Service for Supervision in Protection of the Rights of Consumer and Man Wellbeing, Mytishchi, 141014, Russian Federation
e-mail: masalcev.gv@fncg.ru
Valerii N. Rakitskii
Federal Scientific Center of Hygiene named after F.F. Erisman of the Federal Service for Supervision in Protection of the Rights of Consumer and Man Wellbeing
Email: rakitskii.vn@fncg.ru
MD, PhD, DSci., professor, academician of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Scientific Director of the Institute of Hygiene, Toxicology of Pesticides and Chemical Safety of the Federal Scientific Center of Hygiene named after F.F. Erisman of the Federal Service for Supervision in Protection of the Rights of Consumer and Man Wellbeing, Mytishchi, 141014, Russian Federation
e-mail: rakitskii.vn@fncg.ru
Elena G. Chkhvirkiya
Federal Scientific Center of Hygiene named after F.F. Erisman of the Federal Service for Supervision in Protection of the Rights of Consumer and Man Wellbeing
Email: chkhvirkiya.eg@fncg.ru
MD, PhD, DSci., professor, chief researcher of the Department of Toxicology of the Institute of Hygiene, Toxicology of Pesticides and Chemical Safety of the Federal Scientific Center of Hygiene named after F.F. Erisman of the Federal Service for Supervision in Protection of the Rights of Consumer and Man Wellbeing, Mytishchi, 141014, Russian Federation
e-mail: chkhvirkiya.eg@fncg.ru
Sergey V. Kuzmin
Federal Scientific Center of Hygiene named after F.F. Erisman of the Federal Service for Supervision in Protection of the Rights of Consumer and Man Wellbeing
Email: kuzmin.sv@fncg.ru
MD, PhD, DSci., professor, Director of the Federal Scientific Center of Hygiene named after F.F. Erisman of the Federal Service for Supervision in Protection of the Rights of Consumer and Man Wellbeing, Mytishchi, 141014, Russian Federation
e-mail: kuzmin.sv@fncg.ru
Aristides M. Tsatsakis
University of Crete
Author for correspondence.
Email: aris@med.uoc.gr
PhD, Director at the Toxicology Science and Research Centre in the Department of Forensic Sciences of the Medical School in the University of Crete and The University Hospital; Laboratory of Toxicology, Medical School, University of Crete, 71003 Heraklion, Greece
e-mail: aris@med.uoc.gr
References
- Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). Considerations for assessing the risks of combined exposure to multiple chemicals. OECD Publishing; 2018. https://doi.org/10.1787/ceca15a9-en
- Tsatsakis A.M., ed. Toxicological Risk Assessment and Multi-System Health Impacts from Exposure. Elsevier; 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/C2020-0-02454-0
- WHO. Health effects of combined exposures in the work environment. Technical report series; 1981.
- Hernández A.F., Gil F., Lacasaña M. Toxicological interactions of pesticide mixtures: an update. Arch. Toxicol. 2017; 91(10): 3211–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00204-017-2043-5
- Trdan S., ed. Insecticides resistance. InTech; 2016. https://doi.org/10.5772/60478
- Katsnelson B.A. The combined action of chemicals. In: Kurlyandsky B.A., Filov V.A., eds. General Toxicology [Obshchaya toksikologiya]. Moscow: Meditsina; 2002: 497–520. (in Russian)
- Minigalieva I.A., Katsnelson B.A., Panov V.G., Varaksin A.N., Gurvich V.B., Privalova L.I., et al. Experimental study and mathematical modeling of toxic metals combined action as a scientific foundation for occupational and environmental health risk assessment. A summary of results obtained by the Ekaterinburg research team. Toxicol. Rep. 2017; (4): 194–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.toxrep.2017.04.002 https://elibrary.ru/yvpfsv
- Olsvik P.A., Søfteland L. Mixture toxicity of chlorpyrifos-methyl, pirimiphos-methyl, and nonylphenol in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) hepatocytes. Toxicol. Rep. 2020; (7): 547–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.toxrep.2020.03.008
- Ünlü Endirlik B., Wincent E., Dreij K. Non-additive mixture effects of benzo[a]pyrene and pesticides in vitro and in vivo: Role of AhR signaling. Environ. Pollut. 2023; 316(Pt. 1): 120510. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2022.120510
- Van Scoy A.R., Yue M., Deng X., Tjeerdema R.S. Environmental fate and toxicology of methomyl. Rev. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 2013; 222: 93–109. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-4717-7_3
- Lin Z., Zhang W., Pang S., Huang Y., Mishra S., Bhatt P., et al. Current approaches to and future perspectives on methomyl degradation in contaminated soil/water environments. Molecules. 2020; 25(3): 738. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25030738
- Rakitskii V.N. The choice of doses when planning an experiment to study the combined action of chemicals. Gigiena i Sanitaria (Hygiene and Sanitation, Russian journal). 1985; 64(9): 61–2. https://elibrary.ru/xgpwsz (in Russian)
- МR 4050–85. Setting up experimental studies to study the nature of the combined action of chemicals in order to develop preventive measures. Moscow; 1987.
- Khalafyan A.A. STATISTICA 6. Statistical Data Analysis [STATISTICA 6. Statisticheskii analiz dannykh]. Moscow: Binom-Press; 2007. (in Russian)
- Agresti A. Categorical Data Analysis. John Wiley & Sons; 2003.
- Loewe S. The problem of synergism and antagonism of combined drugs. Arzneimittelforschung. 1953; 3(6): 285–90.
- US EPA. Registration eligibility decision methomyl; 1998. Available at: https://archive.epa.gov/pesticides/reregistration/web/pdf/0028red.pdf
- California Environmental Protection Agency. Summary of Pesticide Use Report Data – 2018. Sacramento: California Department of Pesticide Regulation; 2018. Available at: https://cdpr.ca.gov/docs/pur/pur18rep/18sum.htm#pestuse
- US EPA. Pesticide Fact Sheet Number 177 Bifenthrin; 1988. Available at: https://tinyurl.com/4bu3p85j
- Rosman Y., Makarovsky I., Bentur Y., Shrot S., Dushnistky T., Krivoy A. Carbamate poisoning: treatment recommendations in the setting of a mass casualties event. Am. J. Emerg. Med. 2009; 27(9): 1117–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajem.2009.01.035
- Wolansky M.J., McDaniel K.L., Moser V.C., Crofton K.M. Influence of dosing volume on the neurotoxicity of bifenthrin. Neurotoxicol. Teratol. 2007; 29(3): 377–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ntt.2007.01.007
- Soderlund D.M., Clark J.M., Sheets L.P., Mullin L.S., Piccirillo V.J., Sargent D., et al. Mechanisms of pyrethroid neurotoxicity: implications for cumulative risk assessment. Toxicology. 2002; 171(1): 3–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0300-483x(01)00569-8
Supplementary files
