On elevating the reliability of the hygienic assessment of water quality of natural sources of drinking water supply
- Authors: Rakhmanin Y.A.1, Rosental O.M.2
-
Affiliations:
- A.N. Sysin Research Institute of human ecology and environmental health of the Сenter for Strategic Planning and Management of Medical and Biological Health Risks of the FMBA of Russia
- Institute of Water Problems of the Russian Academy of Sciences
- Issue: Vol 100, No 11 (2021)
- Pages: 1198-1202
- Section: ENVIRONMENTAL HYGIENE
- Published: 06.12.2021
- URL: https://rjsocmed.com/0016-9900/article/view/638721
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.47470/0016-9900-2021-100-11-1198-1202
- ID: 638721
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
Introduction. As new toxic substances accumulate in water bodies, improving the reliability of the hygienic assessment of water quality is put forward in the first place. For the correct solution of this problem, it is relevant to use the direct comparison of deterministic quantities such as the maximum permissible concentration (MPC) of toxic pollutants with the result of its measurements (C) and methods of approach for evaluating the results of research.
Material and methods. To improve the reliability of hygienic assessment of water quality in the proposed method tolerance control, envisaging the elucidation of the implementation type inequality and estimation of the probability of this event: where is the risk of false imprisonment. The number of concurrent measurements of water quality parameters guaranteeing an acceptable level of risk of error of research results is established by the authority of sanitary-epidemiological supervision, receiving a limited level of tolerable error taking into account the possibilities of metrological assurance of conformity assessment/quality of water and its normative level.
Results. It is shown that in cases when the compliance of controlled safety indicators is evaluated, the values of which are limited on both sides, as is the case when studying the physiological usefulness of water, it is necessary to establish a two-way range of values of the permissible probability of violation of the specified requirements.
Conclusion. First installed: the rule “if it is impossible to argue that controlled water quality indicators do not meet hygienic requirements. Thus requirements are met” is not equivalent to the law “if the indicators meet the requirements, then they can’t be inappropriate”, which more reliably indicates compliance with these requirements.
Contribution:
Rakhmanin Yu.А. — concept and design of the research, editing, approval of the article’s final version, responsibility for the integrity of all parts of the article;
Rosenthal O.M. — concept and design of the research, collection and processing of material statistical processing, writing the text.
All authors are responsible for the integrity of all parts of the manuscript and approval of the manuscript final version.
Conflict of interest. The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Acknowledgement. The work was carried out in the framework of the scientific program of the Russian Academy of Sciences, a topic no. 0147-2019-0004 (governmental registration no. АААА-А19-119040990079-3)
Received: February 26, 2021 / Accepted: September 28, 2021 / Published: November 30, 2021
About the authors
Yury A. Rakhmanin
A.N. Sysin Research Institute of human ecology and environmental health of the Сenter for Strategic Planning and Management of Medical and Biological Health Risks of the FMBA of Russia
Author for correspondence.
Email: awme@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-2067-8014
Доктор мед. наук, профессор, академик РАН, Заслуженный деятель науки РФ, гл. науч. консультант ФГБУ «Центр стратегического планирования и управления медико-биологическими рисками здоровью» ФМБА России, 119121, Москва.
e-mail: awme@mail.ru
Russian FederationOleg M. Rosental
Institute of Water Problems of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Email: orosental@rambler.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-6261-6060
MD, PhD. DSci., chief researcher of the Institute of water problems of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, 119991, Russian Federation.
e-mail: orosental@rambler.ru
Russian FederationReferences
- Onishchenko G.G., Rakhmanin Yu.A., Zaytseva N.V., Zemlyanova M.A., Akatova A.A. Scientific and Methodological Aspects of Ensuring Hygienic Safety of the Population under the Influence of Chemical Factors [Nauchno-metodicheskie aspekty obespecheniya gigienicheskoy bezopasnosti naseleniya v usloviyakh vozdeystviya khimicheskikh faktorov]. Moscow: Meditsinskaya kniga; 2004. (in Russian)
- Report of the International court of Justice at the 73rd session of the UN General Assembly in 2018. Available at: https://www.un.org/pga/73/2018/10/25/report-of-the-international-court-of-justice
- Water Yearbook: Central Asia and around the Globe. Available at: https://cawater-info.net/yearbook/index_e.htm
- Rozental O.M., Aleksandrovskaya L.N. Expert and statistic assessment of water quality. J. Water Chem. Technol. 2019; 41(1): 3–14. https://doi.org/10.3103/S1063455X19010016
- Krasovskiy G.N., Rakhmanin Yu.A., Egorova N.A. Extrapolation of Toxicological Data from Animals to Humans [Ekstrapolyatsiya toksikologicheskikh dannykh s zhivotnykh na cheloveka]. Moscow: Meditsina; 2009. (in Russian)
- Ricos C., Alvarez V., Cava F., Garcia-Lario J.V., Hernandez A., Jimenez C.V., et al. Current databases on biological variation: pros, cons and progress. Scand. J. Clin. Lab. Invest. 1999; (59): 491–500. https://doi.org/10.1080/00365519950185229
- WHO. Human health risk assessment toolkit: chemical hazards. Geneva; 2010.
- Rakhmanin Yu.A., Mel’tser A.V., Kiselev A.V., Erastova N.V. Hygienic substantiation of management decisions with the use of the integral assessment of drinking water on indices of chemical harmlessness and epidemiological safety. Gigiena i Sanitaria (Hygiene and Sanitation, Russian journal). 2017; 96(4): 302–5. https://doi.org/10.1882/0016-9900-2017-96-4-302-305 (in Russian)
- Zaytseva N.V., Sboev A.S., Kleyn S.V., Vekovshinina S.A. Drinking water quality: health risk factors and efficiency of control and surveillance activities by Rospotrebnadzor. Analiz riska zdorov’yu. 2019; (2): 44–55. https://doi.org/10.21668/health.risk/2019.2.05 (in Russian)
- Rak J., Pietrucha K. Risk in drinking water quality control. Przemysl. Chemiczny. 2008; 87(5): 554–6.
- Astaraie-Imania M., Kapelan Z., Butler D. Risk-based water quality management in an integrated urban wastewater system under climate change and urbanisation. Available at: https://ore.exeter.ac.uk/repository/bitstream/handle/10871/21292
- Tulakin A.V., Plitman S.I., Ampleeva G.P., Pivneva O.S. The risk-oriented supervision of drinking water: problems and possibilities. Prikladnye informatsionnye aspekty meditsiny. 2018; 21(3): 28–31. (in Russian)
- Nefedova E.D., Khyamyalyaynen M.M., Kovzharovskaya I.B., Shevchik G.V. Risk-oriented approach to the arrangement of drinking water quality control. Vodosnabzhenie i sanitarnaya tekhnika. 2018; (3): 5–9. (in Russian)
- UNESCO. World Water Development Report 2019 – Leaving No One Behind. Available at: https://en.unesco.org/themes/water-security/wwap/wwdr/2019
- Northcott K., Bartlett S., Sheehan D., Snape I., Scales P., Gray S. Water quality risk management strategies for remote operations. Water Sci. Technol. Water Supply. 2018; 18(2): 482–9. https://doi.org/10.2166/ws.2017.130
- Shtabskiy B.M., Kagan Yu.S., Katsnel’son B.A. Determination of harmless levels of exposure to chemicals as a diagnostic task of hygiene. Gigiena i Sanitaria (Hygiene and Sanitation, Russian journal). 1983; 62(11): 74–6. (in Russian)
- Travis C.C., Richter S.A., Crouch E.A.C., Wilson R., Klema E.D. Cancer risk management. A review of 132 federal regulatory decisions. Environ. Sci. Technol. 1987; 21(5): 415–20. https://doi.org/10.1051/radiopro/2012020
Supplementary files
